Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Arbitrator's award set aside u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to lack of evidence regarding claimant's readiness to supply materials, arbitrator acting beyond jurisdiction by awarding components barred by agreement between parties, and patent illegality. HC held that arbitrator being creature of contract is bound by agreement's terms, and award violating contractual bar is beyond jurisdiction requiring court's interference. Impugned arbitral award dated September 24, 2020 set aside, application allowed.
Arbitrator's award set aside u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to lack of evidence regarding claimant's readiness to supply materials, arbitrator acting beyond jurisdiction by awarding components barred by agreement between parties, and patent illegality. HC held that arbitrator being creature of contract is bound by agreement's terms, and award violating contractual bar is beyond jurisdiction requiring court's interference. Impugned arbitral award dated September 24, 2020 set aside, application allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
