Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued on 15.10.2013, beyond the prescribed time limit of six months from the end of the assessment year, i.e., 30.9.2013. The assessee failed to challenge the validity of the notice before the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the initiation of proceedings and jurisdiction invoked by the Assessing Officer suffered from infirmity as the notice u/s 143(2) was issued beyond the statutory time limit. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled the impugned assessment order as invalid, rendering the issues raised on merits academic and not requiring adjudication.
The notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued on 15.10.2013, beyond the prescribed time limit of six months from the end of the assessment year, i.e., 30.9.2013. The assessee failed to challenge the validity of the notice before the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the initiation of proceedings and jurisdiction invoked by the Assessing Officer suffered from infirmity as the notice u/s 143(2) was issued beyond the statutory time limit. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled the impugned assessment order as invalid, rendering the issues raised on merits academic and not requiring adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
