Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section 143(1). Return filed beyond due date u/s 139(1). Same return accepted u/s 143(3) proceedings. Impugned appeal order unjustified as same authority cannot take divergent view on same return. Addition deleted as Assessing Officer violated second Proviso of Section 143(1) by not granting reasonable opportunity. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.
Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section 143(1). Return filed beyond due date u/s 139(1). Same return accepted u/s 143(3) proceedings. Impugned appeal order unjustified as same authority cannot take divergent view on same return. Addition deleted as Assessing Officer violated second Proviso of Section 143(1) by not granting reasonable opportunity. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
