Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section 143(1). Return filed beyond due date u/s 139(1). Same return accepted u/s 143(3) proceedings. Impugned appeal order unjustified as same authority cannot take divergent view on same return. Addition deleted as Assessing Officer violated second Proviso of Section 143(1) by not granting reasonable opportunity. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.
Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section 143(1). Return filed beyond due date u/s 139(1). Same return accepted u/s 143(3) proceedings. Impugned appeal order unjustified as same authority cannot take divergent view on same return. Addition deleted as Assessing Officer violated second Proviso of Section 143(1) by not granting reasonable opportunity. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
