Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petitioners sought condonation of delay in filing belated annual returns and balance sheets without paying additional fees. The Court held that despite the existence of a scheme for condonation of delay, it had not extended the benefit to the Petitioners in its previous order dated 11.02.2021. The Court had only directed restoration of the Petitioners' names subject to payment of requisite fees, implying late fees. The Petitioners cannot now seek relief not granted in the previous order. They must pay the late fees for restoration of their names. The petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.