Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed. Court held that as per GKN DRIVESHAFTS (INDIA) LTD. [2002 (11) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT], it is mandatory for Assessing Officer to dispose of objections filed by assessee for reopening assessment. Without entering merits, impugned assessment orders quashed and matters remanded to Assessing Officer to dispose of objections raised by assessee for reopening assessment.
Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed. Court held that as per GKN DRIVESHAFTS (INDIA) LTD. [2002 (11) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT], it is mandatory for Assessing Officer to dispose of objections filed by assessee for reopening assessment. Without entering merits, impugned assessment orders quashed and matters remanded to Assessing Officer to dispose of objections raised by assessee for reopening assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
