Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed. Court held that as per GKN DRIVESHAFTS (INDIA) LTD. [2002 (11) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT], it is mandatory for Assessing Officer to dispose of objections filed by assessee for reopening assessment. Without entering merits, impugned assessment orders quashed and matters remanded to Assessing Officer to dispose of objections raised by assessee for reopening assessment.
Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed. Court held that as per GKN DRIVESHAFTS (INDIA) LTD. [2002 (11) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT], it is mandatory for Assessing Officer to dispose of objections filed by assessee for reopening assessment. Without entering merits, impugned assessment orders quashed and matters remanded to Assessing Officer to dispose of objections raised by assessee for reopening assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
