Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case did not consider PLA amount as central excise duty, but a deposit utilizable for duty payment. Provisions of Section 11B inapplicable for PLA deposit refund. Commissioner's misinterpretation of Modipon Ltd. case rejected. Impugned order set aside, refund allowed, appeal allowed. CESTAT refers to Appellate Tribunal.
Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case did not consider PLA amount as central excise duty, but a deposit utilizable for duty payment. Provisions of Section 11B inapplicable for PLA deposit refund. Commissioner's misinterpretation of Modipon Ltd. case rejected. Impugned order set aside, refund allowed, appeal allowed. CESTAT refers to Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
