Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case did not consider PLA amount as central excise duty, but a deposit utilizable for duty payment. Provisions of Section 11B inapplicable for PLA deposit refund. Commissioner's misinterpretation of Modipon Ltd. case rejected. Impugned order set aside, refund allowed, appeal allowed. CESTAT refers to Appellate Tribunal.
Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case did not consider PLA amount as central excise duty, but a deposit utilizable for duty payment. Provisions of Section 11B inapplicable for PLA deposit refund. Commissioner's misinterpretation of Modipon Ltd. case rejected. Impugned order set aside, refund allowed, appeal allowed. CESTAT refers to Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
