Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service or Business Auxiliary Service classification discussed. Extended period of limitation rightly invoked as certain agreements and invoices were not brought to department's knowledge. Demand of Rs. 1,12,86,898/- on manpower services for June 2005 to March 2007 confirmed along with equal penalty u/s 78. Services provided by overseas service provider under Selling Agreement and Master Agreement examined. Demand for April 2001 to April 2006 set aside as Business Auxiliary Service excludes IT services. Demand from April 2006 to March 2007 remanded for redetermination after considering appellant's submissions on IT service exclusion from Business Auxiliary Service. Penalties except equal penalty u/s 78 set aside.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
