Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Jurisdictional issue regarding monetary threshold for adjudication by customs officers examined. Appellate authority rightly accepted lack of jurisdiction of original adjudicating officer based on notification prescribing monetary limits. Remand to proper officer permissible u/s 128A(3). However, appellate order did not decide limitation issue, leaving it open for petitioner to raise before proper officer on remand. Petition dismissed, not warranting interference with remand order on jurisdictional ground.
Jurisdictional issue regarding monetary threshold for adjudication by customs officers examined. Appellate authority rightly accepted lack of jurisdiction of original adjudicating officer based on notification prescribing monetary limits. Remand to proper officer permissible u/s 128A(3). However, appellate order did not decide limitation issue, leaving it open for petitioner to raise before proper officer on remand. Petition dismissed, not warranting interference with remand order on jurisdictional ground.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
