Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The High Court addressed the issue of reimbursement of...
High Court: Starting production before approval doesn't deny incentives under Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy. Order set aside, payments due in 3 months.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The High Court addressed the issue of reimbursement of VAT/ET/SGST under Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011. The petitioner's claim was rejected due to starting production before approval by SIPB. The Court held that starting production before approval does not justify denial of incentives. The impugned order was set aside, directing authorities to grant incentives from approval date and make payments within three months. The petition was allowed.
The High Court addressed the issue of reimbursement of VAT/ET/SGST under Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011. The petitioner's claim was rejected due to starting production before approval by SIPB. The Court held that starting production before approval does not justify denial of incentives. The impugned order was set aside, directing authorities to grant incentives from approval date and make payments within three months. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
