Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
CESTAT, an appellate tribunal, addressed the maintainability of appeals based on a CBIC circular setting a monetary limit. The re-assessment of goods at an enhanced value was reversed, restoring self-assessment. The issue was whether additional consideration was paid to exporters. The onus was on the department to prove declared value. The duty involved in each appeal was below the Rs.50 lakh limit per the circular. Citing a Bombay High Court case, it was ruled that appeals below certain monetary limits should be disposed of accordingly. The department's appeals were deemed not maintainable under the 02.11.2023 instructions. All 7 appeals were dismissed.
CESTAT, an appellate tribunal, addressed the maintainability of appeals based on a CBIC circular setting a monetary limit. The re-assessment of goods at an enhanced value was reversed, restoring self-assessment. The issue was whether additional consideration was paid to exporters. The onus was on the department to prove declared value. The duty involved in each appeal was below the Rs.50 lakh limit per the circular. Citing a Bombay High Court case, it was ruled that appeals below certain monetary limits should be disposed of accordingly. The department's appeals were deemed not maintainable under the 02.11.2023 instructions. All 7 appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
