Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeals were maintainable in view of the CBIC instructions fixing a monetary threshold for filing and pursuing appeals before the Tribunal.
Analysis: The instructions dated 02.11.2023 were issued in exercise of the power to regulate filing of appeals and prescribed a monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakh for appeals before the Tribunal. The duty involved in each appeal was below that threshold. The instructions also contemplated withdrawal of pending cases falling below the prescribed limit. The Tribunal treated the instructions as binding on the Department and followed the consistent judicial approach that appeals below the monetary limit are not to be pursued.
Conclusion: The appeals were not maintainable and were dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue could not pursue the appeals because the disputed duty in each matter was below the applicable monetary limit fixed by the Board, and the merits of the reassessment were not adjudicated.
Ratio Decidendi: Board instructions issued under the statutory power to regulate appeals are binding on the Department, and appeals below the prescribed monetary limit are not maintainable.