Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Pyratax-Vinyl Pyridine Latex was classifiable as raw rubber under Item 39 of the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, or as an article falling under the residuary and synthetic resin entries.
Analysis: Classification under a fiscal statute must ordinarily be determined according to the commercial understanding and common parlance of the trade, while technical tests serve only as aids. The imported goods were examined in their imported condition, and the record showed that V.P. Latex was known in trade and commerce as a synthetic rubber latex, was used in tyre manufacture as such, and had substantial support in technical and commercial materials as falling within the rubber category. The decisive factor adopted by the revisional authority, namely the ultimate commercial use of the material in dry form, was held to be irrelevant because the tariff entry did not make classification depend on end-use. When an article has a reasonable claim to an enumerated tariff entry, it should not be forced into a residuary entry on an extraneous basis.
Conclusion: V.P. Latex was held classifiable as rubber raw under Item 39 of the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, and not under the residuary or synthetic resin entries.