Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
CESTAT, an appellate tribunal, addressed the maintainability of appeals based on a CBIC circular setting a monetary limit. The re-assessment of goods at an enhanced value was reversed, restoring self-assessment. The issue was whether additional consideration was paid to exporters. The onus was on the department to prove declared value. The duty involved in each appeal was below the Rs.50 lakh limit per the circular. Citing a Bombay High Court case, it was ruled that appeals below certain monetary limits should be disposed of accordingly. The department's appeals were deemed not maintainable under the 02.11.2023 instructions. All 7 appeals were dismissed.
CESTAT, an appellate tribunal, addressed the maintainability of appeals based on a CBIC circular setting a monetary limit. The re-assessment of goods at an enhanced value was reversed, restoring self-assessment. The issue was whether additional consideration was paid to exporters. The onus was on the department to prove declared value. The duty involved in each appeal was below the Rs.50 lakh limit per the circular. Citing a Bombay High Court case, it was ruled that appeals below certain monetary limits should be disposed of accordingly. The department's appeals were deemed not maintainable under the 02.11.2023 instructions. All 7 appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
