Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court addressed a challenge to appellate orders rejecting appeals as time-barred u/s 107 of GST enactments. The petitioner's appeals were filed 21 to 24 days beyond the limitation period but explained the delay due to rectification petitions. The petitioner paid 10% of the disputed tax and had funds appropriated from their bank account. The Court directed the appellate authority to accept and decide the appeals on merits without considering the limitation issue. The impugned orders were quashed, and the bank attachment was lifted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court addressed a challenge to appellate orders rejecting appeals as time-barred u/s 107 of GST enactments. The petitioner's appeals were filed 21 to 24 days beyond the limitation period but explained the delay due to rectification petitions. The petitioner paid 10% of the disputed tax and had funds appropriated from their bank account. The Court directed the appellate authority to accept and decide the appeals on merits without considering the limitation issue. The impugned orders were quashed, and the bank attachment was lifted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
