<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The court decided to accept the late appeals in GST case due to valid reasons provided by the petitioner.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78807</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed a challenge to appellate orders rejecting appeals as time-barred u/s 107 of GST enactments. The petitioner&#039;s appeals were filed 21 to 24 days beyond the limitation period but explained the delay due to rectification petitions. The petitioner paid 10% of the disputed tax and had funds appropriated from their bank account. The Court directed the appellate authority to accept and decide the appeals on merits without considering the limitation issue. The impugned orders were quashed, and the bank attachment was lifted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:38:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The court decided to accept the late appeals in GST case due to valid reasons provided by the petitioner.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78807</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed a challenge to appellate orders rejecting appeals as time-barred u/s 107 of GST enactments. The petitioner&#039;s appeals were filed 21 to 24 days beyond the limitation period but explained the delay due to rectification petitions. The petitioner paid 10% of the disputed tax and had funds appropriated from their bank account. The Court directed the appellate authority to accept and decide the appeals on merits without considering the limitation issue. The impugned orders were quashed, and the bank attachment was lifted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:38:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>