Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that penalty proceedings post a search are not warranted. Quashed impugned orders of March 21, 2018 and August 31, 2018, finding them unjustified. Petition allowed based on lack of justification for penalty u/s 129 post-search.
The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that penalty proceedings post a search are not warranted. Quashed impugned orders of March 21, 2018 and August 31, 2018, finding them unjustified. Petition allowed based on lack of justification for penalty u/s 129 post-search.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
