<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty proceedings under GST Act initiated after premises search deemed unjustified by High Court. Orders quashed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78806</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that penalty proceedings post a search are not warranted. Quashed impugned orders of March 21, 2018 and August 31, 2018, finding them unjustified. Petition allowed based on lack of justification for penalty u/s 129 post-search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:38:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:38:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty proceedings under GST Act initiated after premises search deemed unjustified by High Court. Orders quashed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78806</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 following premises search. Relying on precedent, the Court held that penalty proceedings post a search are not warranted. Quashed impugned orders of March 21, 2018 and August 31, 2018, finding them unjustified. Petition allowed based on lack of justification for penalty u/s 129 post-search.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:38:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>