Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating material was found during search, challenging the applicability of section 153A. Unexplained cash credit additions lacked proper investigation, leading to deletion of Rs. 3,70,000 addition. Income deposited in cash was declared and documented, leading to deletion of Rs. 10,50,000 addition. Addition u/s 68 was disputed, with relief granted by CIT(A). Disallowance of depreciation on vehicle was found baseless. CIT(A) upheld unexplained cash credit appeal, rejecting Department's challenge on genuineness. Overall, Department's appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit.
The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating material was found during search, challenging the applicability of section 153A. Unexplained cash credit additions lacked proper investigation, leading to deletion of Rs. 3,70,000 addition. Income deposited in cash was declared and documented, leading to deletion of Rs. 10,50,000 addition. Addition u/s 68 was disputed, with relief granted by CIT(A). Disallowance of depreciation on vehicle was found baseless. CIT(A) upheld unexplained cash credit appeal, rejecting Department's challenge on genuineness. Overall, Department's appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
