Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment made, not outside it. Refund proceedings are akin to execution proceedings and cannot alter assessments. Appellant's voluntary tax payment without challenging assessment made it final. Without challenging assessment, refund claim is not maintainable. Refund proceedings based on a decision where appellant wasn't a party and without challenging assessment are to be rejected. No need to consider Section 11B of Excise Act. Appeal dismissed.
The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment made, not outside it. Refund proceedings are akin to execution proceedings and cannot alter assessments. Appellant's voluntary tax payment without challenging assessment made it final. Without challenging assessment, refund claim is not maintainable. Refund proceedings based on a decision where appellant wasn't a party and without challenging assessment are to be rejected. No need to consider Section 11B of Excise Act. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
