Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed several issues. Firstly, it...
ITAT ruled in favor of assessee on disallowance of ATS fees & 14A disallowance. Bank guarantee commission & ESOP cost allowed. TP adjustment clarified.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Appellate Tribunal addressed several issues. Firstly, it upheld the deletion of disallowance of Annual Technical Service fees, citing consistency with past decisions. Secondly, it ruled against the disallowance u/s 14A, emphasizing the need for the AO to justify invoking Rule 8D. Thirdly, it rejected the addition of Bank guarantee commission, following past favorable decisions. Fourthly, it disagreed with adding interest on NPA, aligning with previous rulings. Fifthly, it remanded the ESOP cost issue for fresh consideration based on legal precedents. Lastly, it adjusted the TP for international transactions, rejecting equating LOC with bank guarantees and directing ALP adjustment based on safe harbor rules.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed several issues. Firstly, it upheld the deletion of disallowance of Annual Technical Service fees, citing consistency with past decisions. Secondly, it ruled against the disallowance u/s 14A, emphasizing the need for the AO to justify invoking Rule 8D. Thirdly, it rejected the addition of Bank guarantee commission, following past favorable decisions. Fourthly, it disagreed with adding interest on NPA, aligning with previous rulings. Fifthly, it remanded the ESOP cost issue for fresh consideration based on legal precedents. Lastly, it adjusted the TP for international transactions, rejecting equating LOC with bank guarantees and directing ALP adjustment based on safe harbor rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.