Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of estimating Gross Profit by considering all bank deposits as turnover. The assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim that not all credits were turnover. Without documentary evidence or accounting records, the Assessing Officer estimated income at 8%. The CIT(A) directed estimation at 6%, providing relief to the assessee. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the assessee's grounds for appeal.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of estimating Gross Profit by considering all bank deposits as turnover. The assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim that not all credits were turnover. Without documentary evidence or accounting records, the Assessing Officer estimated income at 8%. The CIT(A) directed estimation at 6%, providing relief to the assessee. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the assessee's grounds for appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.