The case involved denial of benefit u/s N/N. 32/97-Cus for...
CESTAT denies benefit of N/N. 32/97-Cus for imported goods. Duty demand not sustainable as goods were exported after job work. Confiscation order set aside.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The case involved denial of benefit u/s N/N. 32/97-Cus for clearance of imported multi-color granite blocks due to not acquiring items free of cost. Commissioner (Appeals) directed duty recovery for goods imported via two Bills of Entry and ordered confiscation. Tribunal found goods were exported after job work, making appellant ineligible for the notification. As goods were exported, duty demand was unsustainable. Confiscation order was improper as goods were re-exported, following legal precedent. Tribunal set aside the order, restoring original authority's decision and allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.