Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The case involves a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) to entertain an appeal u/s 142(9) of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding refund of CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal held that claims for refund must be processed according to existing laws, specifically Chapter V of the Finance Act and the Central Excise Act. The decision in Bosch Electrical applies to refunds u/s 142(9)(b), allowing appeals to be filed with the CESTAT. The matter is now to be decided by the appropriate Bench.
The case involves a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) to entertain an appeal u/s 142(9) of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding refund of CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal held that claims for refund must be processed according to existing laws, specifically Chapter V of the Finance Act and the Central Excise Act. The decision in Bosch Electrical applies to refunds u/s 142(9)(b), allowing appeals to be filed with the CESTAT. The matter is now to be decided by the appropriate Bench.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
