Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The High Court held that the petitioner Company, which paid entry tax on packing materials in Assam, may be entitled to a refund as per Rule 29(1) of Assam Value Added Tax Rules, 2005. The Court noted a detailed refund mechanism under the law and referenced a previous case where no entry tax was leviable on packing materials. The Court ruled that the petitioner must first exhaust the statutory remedy by applying for a refund under Section 50 of the Act within one month. The time spent from filing the writ petition will be excluded in calculating the deadline for the refund application. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court held that the petitioner Company, which paid entry tax on packing materials in Assam, may be entitled to a refund as per Rule 29(1) of Assam Value Added Tax Rules, 2005. The Court noted a detailed refund mechanism under the law and referenced a previous case where no entry tax was leviable on packing materials. The Court ruled that the petitioner must first exhaust the statutory remedy by applying for a refund under Section 50 of the Act within one month. The time spent from filing the writ petition will be excluded in calculating the deadline for the refund application. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
