Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The impugned order did not consider the show-cause reply. The Court held that failure to grant a personal hearing was unacceptable. The Assessing Officer must consider the show-cause reply even if a personal hearing is not granted. The impugned order was set aside and remanded for a fresh decision with a date fixed for a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The impugned order did not consider the show-cause reply. The Court held that failure to grant a personal hearing was unacceptable. The Assessing Officer must consider the show-cause reply even if a personal hearing is not granted. The impugned order was set aside and remanded for a fresh decision with a date fixed for a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
