GST Assessment Order Overturned: Authority Must Provide Personal Hearing and Fairly Evaluate Petitioner's Show-Cause Reply HC allowed the challenge to GST assessment order. The court set aside the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
GST Assessment Order Overturned: Authority Must Provide Personal Hearing and Fairly Evaluate Petitioner's Show-Cause Reply
HC allowed the challenge to GST assessment order. The court set aside the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the authority to provide personal hearing and properly evaluate the petitioner's show-cause reply. The decision emphasized procedural fairness in tax proceedings by ensuring opportunity to be heard.
Issues involved: Challenge to order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for financial year 2017-18 due to lack of consideration of show-cause reply and absence of opportunity for personal hearing.
Summary: The petitioner challenged an order dated 30.12.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes, Barpeta Road-1, Guwahati Zone-B under Section 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, along with attachment to DRC 07 for the financial year 2017-18. The petitioner's grievance was that the assessing authority did not fix a date for hearing and failed to consider the show-cause reply submitted in response to a notice dated 30.09.2023.
The State GST standing counsel opposed the petition, stating that no prayer for personal hearing was made by the petitioner despite submitting a reply on 20.12.2023. The counsel argued that the Assessing Officer decided the matter without granting a personal hearing, and thus, interference with the impugned order was unwarranted.
The Court noted that the officer did not inform the petitioner that a personal hearing required a specific request and found the denial of an opportunity for personal hearing unacceptable. It emphasized that even if a personal hearing was not granted, the Assessing Officer should have considered the show-cause reply, which was not done in this case.
Consequently, the Court deemed it appropriate to set aside the order dated 30.12.2023 and remand the matter for a fresh decision by the same authority, directing the fixing of a date for a personal hearing for the petitioner. The respondents were granted liberty to seek modification of the order. The petitioner was instructed to provide a certified copy of the order to the respondent authorities, and the instruction produced by the State GST standing counsel was retained on record.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
