Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
The ITAT Pune set aside an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service of hearing notice. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without discussing the merits of TP adjustment. The tribunal held that CIT(A) should have addressed the appeal's substance even in ex-parte cases, citing a precedent. The matter was remitted to CIT(A) for fresh consideration in accordance with the law.
The ITAT Pune set aside an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service of hearing notice. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without discussing the merits of TP adjustment. The tribunal held that CIT(A) should have addressed the appeal's substance even in ex-parte cases, citing a precedent. The matter was remitted to CIT(A) for fresh consideration in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.