Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The ITAT Pune set aside an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service of hearing notice. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without discussing the merits of TP adjustment. The tribunal held that CIT(A) should have addressed the appeal's substance even in ex-parte cases, citing a precedent. The matter was remitted to CIT(A) for fresh consideration in accordance with the law.
The ITAT Pune set aside an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service of hearing notice. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without discussing the merits of TP adjustment. The tribunal held that CIT(A) should have addressed the appeal's substance even in ex-parte cases, citing a precedent. The matter was remitted to CIT(A) for fresh consideration in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.