Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an assessment u/s 153A, focusing on additions u/s 68 and undisclosed sources based on the Assessee's bank statement. The Tribunal found no incriminating material during the search to support the additions. Citing precedents like Kabul Chawla and Meeta Gutgutia, the Tribunal deleted the addition. The Supreme Court in Abhisar Build well P. Ltd. held that additions without incriminating material from a search or requisition are invalid. The Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.