Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The case involves attachment of immovable property jointly owned by appellant and brothers for government dues recovery. The attachment was done u/r 2(vi) of Rules of 1995 u/s 156 r/w. 142 of Customs Act, 1962. The property share is 20% appellant's and 80% brothers'. As partnership firm liability is joint u/s 25 of Indian Partnership Act, attaching entire property for firm's dues is improper. Interest u/s 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable pre-enactment. As dues paid, property attachment set aside, appeal allowed.
The case involves attachment of immovable property jointly owned by appellant and brothers for government dues recovery. The attachment was done u/r 2(vi) of Rules of 1995 u/s 156 r/w. 142 of Customs Act, 1962. The property share is 20% appellant's and 80% brothers'. As partnership firm liability is joint u/s 25 of Indian Partnership Act, attaching entire property for firm's dues is improper. Interest u/s 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable pre-enactment. As dues paid, property attachment set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
