Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of principles of natural justice in relation to an order issued under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found the impugned order to be invalid as it failed to consider the detailed replies and supporting documents submitted by the Petitioner. The Proper Officer did not assess the reply on its merits and did not seek further clarification or documents from the Petitioner. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order dated 29.04.2024, ruling it as unsustainable. The petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.
The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of principles of natural justice in relation to an order issued under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found the impugned order to be invalid as it failed to consider the detailed replies and supporting documents submitted by the Petitioner. The Proper Officer did not assess the reply on its merits and did not seek further clarification or documents from the Petitioner. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order dated 29.04.2024, ruling it as unsustainable. The petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
