Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of principles of natural justice in relation to an order issued under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found the impugned order to be invalid as it failed to consider the detailed replies and supporting documents submitted by the Petitioner. The Proper Officer did not assess the reply on its merits and did not seek further clarification or documents from the Petitioner. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order dated 29.04.2024, ruling it as unsustainable. The petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.
The Delhi High Court reviewed a case involving a violation of principles of natural justice in relation to an order issued under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found the impugned order to be invalid as it failed to consider the detailed replies and supporting documents submitted by the Petitioner. The Proper Officer did not assess the reply on its merits and did not seek further clarification or documents from the Petitioner. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order dated 29.04.2024, ruling it as unsustainable. The petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
