Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
The Delhi High Court addressed issues related to reimbursement of software costs, reimbursement of expatriate salaries, and lease registration charges. The court held that the addition made for reimbursement of software costs was not proven as the assessee failed to demonstrate actual receipt and use of software in India for business purposes. Referring to a Supreme Court judgment, it was established that payments to nonresident software suppliers were not royalty and not subject to TDS. The court found the ITAT's deletion of the addition for expatriate salaries lacked sufficient reasoning and required further consideration. Regarding lease registration charges, the ITAT's decision to not amortize them over the lease period was upheld, as registration charges are one-time expenses not linked to the lease duration. The court admitted appeals to determine if the ITAT erred in deleting the additions without considering the potential double deduction nature of the claims.
The Delhi High Court addressed issues related to reimbursement of software costs, reimbursement of expatriate salaries, and lease registration charges. The court held that the addition made for reimbursement of software costs was not proven as the assessee failed to demonstrate actual receipt and use of software in India for business purposes. Referring to a Supreme Court judgment, it was established that payments to nonresident software suppliers were not royalty and not subject to TDS. The court found the ITAT's deletion of the addition for expatriate salaries lacked sufficient reasoning and required further consideration. Regarding lease registration charges, the ITAT's decision to not amortize them over the lease period was upheld, as registration charges are one-time expenses not linked to the lease duration. The court admitted appeals to determine if the ITAT erred in deleting the additions without considering the potential double deduction nature of the claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.