Delhi HC admits appeal on ITAT's deletion of expatriate salary and royalty payment additions under section 195

Delhi HC admitted appeal on question whether ITAT unlawfully deleted additions for expatriate salary reimbursement and royalty payments. Court upheld ITAT's deletion of software cost additions, citing SC precedent in Engineering Analysis Centre that software payments through EULAs don't constitute royalty liable for TDS under section 195. For expatriate salary reimbursement, HC found ITAT's reasoning insufficient and merited further consideration. Regarding lease registration charges, HC agreed with ITAT that such charges shouldn't be amortized over lease period, being one-time expenditure incurred at execution, consistent with various HC decisions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Reimbursement of expenses towards software costs.
2. Reimbursement of expatriate salaries and payment for royalty.
3. Lease registration charges.

Summary of Judgment:

1. Reimbursement of Expenses Towards Software Costs:
The Principal Commissioner challenged the ITAT's deletion of additions made for "reimbursement of expenses" towards software costs to AE, arguing that the respondent failed to prove the actual receipt and use of such software in India for its business purposes. The court, referencing the Supreme Court judgment in *Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT* [(2022) 3 SCC 321], found that the proposed questions (i) and (ii) should be answered against the Revenue.

2. Reimbursement of Expatriate Salaries and Payment for Royalty:
The TPO observed that the major beneficiary of the services rendered by seconded employees was the Associated Enterprises (AEs). Consequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) adjusted the expatriate employees' salaries to NIL. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that the appellant had discharged its onus by providing documentation proving the employees worked in India, and TDS was deducted at source for their salaries. The ITAT upheld this view without assigning sufficient reasons, prompting the court to hold that question (iii) merits further consideration.

3. Lease Registration Charges:
The ITAT noted that registration charges incurred during the execution of an instrument under the Stamp Act, 1899, should not be amortized over the lease period. The court agreed, stating that the payment of registration charges is a one-time expenditure incurred at the time of execution and registration of the instrument. The ITAT's observation was supported by consistent positions taken by various High Courts, including Bombay and Himachal Pradesh, which held that registration charges should be treated as revenue expenditure and allowed as a deduction in the year incurred.

Conclusion:
The court admitted the appeals on the question of law regarding the deletion of additions made for purported reimbursement of expatriate salaries and payment for royalty, and scheduled the next hearing for 13.08.2024.

---