Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in not conducting a proper enquiry into the unexplained credit u/s 68. The AO and CIT(A) have a duty to investigate thoroughly. The CIT(A) should not have dismissed the AO's concerns without further enquiry. The creditworthiness of the share applicant was not proven, and the CIT(A) failed to consider vital aspects. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for proper re-examination. Section 251 grants wide powers to the CIT(A) to enhance assessments. The CIT(A) has extraordinary powers to examine all aspects of an issue. The CIT(A) should have conducted necessary inquiries to determine taxability accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in not conducting a proper enquiry into the unexplained credit u/s 68. The AO and CIT(A) have a duty to investigate thoroughly. The CIT(A) should not have dismissed the AO's concerns without further enquiry. The creditworthiness of the share applicant was not proven, and the CIT(A) failed to consider vital aspects. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for proper re-examination. Section 251 grants wide powers to the CIT(A) to enhance assessments. The CIT(A) has extraordinary powers to examine all aspects of an issue. The CIT(A) should have conducted necessary inquiries to determine taxability accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
