Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in not conducting a proper enquiry into the unexplained credit u/s 68. The AO and CIT(A) have a duty to investigate thoroughly. The CIT(A) should not have dismissed the AO's concerns without further enquiry. The creditworthiness of the share applicant was not proven, and the CIT(A) failed to consider vital aspects. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for proper re-examination. Section 251 grants wide powers to the CIT(A) to enhance assessments. The CIT(A) has extraordinary powers to examine all aspects of an issue. The CIT(A) should have conducted necessary inquiries to determine taxability accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
