Capital Asset Conversion Requires Proven Business Stock Treatment; Paper Consideration in Spousal Flat Transfers Does Not Create Taxable Business Inco...
Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuin...
Commercial property status protects capital-gains exemption when residential-house ownership limits are tested, while agricultural-land character gove...
Investigation deposits refunded after failed customs demands fall outside the statutory appellate pre-deposit interest regime and may attract compensa...
Resolution plan finality extinguishes unquantified operational-creditor claims and pending proceedings unless the approved plan expressly preserves th...
The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in not conducting a proper enquiry into the unexplained credit u/s 68. The AO and CIT(A) have a duty to investigate thoroughly. The CIT(A) should not have dismissed the AO's concerns without further enquiry. The creditworthiness of the share applicant was not proven, and the CIT(A) failed to consider vital aspects. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for proper re-examination. Section 251 grants wide powers to the CIT(A) to enhance assessments. The CIT(A) has extraordinary powers to examine all aspects of an issue. The CIT(A) should have conducted necessary inquiries to determine taxability accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in not conducting a proper enquiry into the unexplained credit u/s 68. The AO and CIT(A) have a duty to investigate thoroughly. The CIT(A) should not have dismissed the AO's concerns without further enquiry. The creditworthiness of the share applicant was not proven, and the CIT(A) failed to consider vital aspects. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for proper re-examination. Section 251 grants wide powers to the CIT(A) to enhance assessments. The CIT(A) has extraordinary powers to examine all aspects of an issue. The CIT(A) should have conducted necessary inquiries to determine taxability accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
