Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in not conducting a proper enquiry into the unexplained credit u/s 68. The AO and CIT(A) have a duty to investigate thoroughly. The CIT(A) should not have dismissed the AO's concerns without further enquiry. The creditworthiness of the share applicant was not proven, and the CIT(A) failed to consider vital aspects. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for proper re-examination. Section 251 grants wide powers to the CIT(A) to enhance assessments. The CIT(A) has extraordinary powers to examine all aspects of an issue. The CIT(A) should have conducted necessary inquiries to determine taxability accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in not conducting a proper enquiry into the unexplained credit u/s 68. The AO and CIT(A) have a duty to investigate thoroughly. The CIT(A) should not have dismissed the AO's concerns without further enquiry. The creditworthiness of the share applicant was not proven, and the CIT(A) failed to consider vital aspects. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for proper re-examination. Section 251 grants wide powers to the CIT(A) to enhance assessments. The CIT(A) has extraordinary powers to examine all aspects of an issue. The CIT(A) should have conducted necessary inquiries to determine taxability accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
