Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
The ITAT Surat (Appellate Tribunal) considered an appeal regarding the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus LTCG and unexplained cash credit. The appellant's claim for exemption u/s 10(38) in relation to surplus earned on the sale of shares held for the long term was rejected. The Tribunal held that the assessee conducted the share sale through BSE, paid security transaction tax, and there were no allegations against the share broker for price manipulation. Consequently, there was no justification for treating the LTCG as unexplained cash credit without cogent evidence. The decision favored the assessee.
The ITAT Surat (Appellate Tribunal) considered an appeal regarding the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus LTCG and unexplained cash credit. The appellant's claim for exemption u/s 10(38) in relation to surplus earned on the sale of shares held for the long term was rejected. The Tribunal held that the assessee conducted the share sale through BSE, paid security transaction tax, and there were no allegations against the share broker for price manipulation. Consequently, there was no justification for treating the LTCG as unexplained cash credit without cogent evidence. The decision favored the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
