Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
CESTAT New Delhi overturned the revocation of a Customs Broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposition due to alleged involvement in fraudulent IGST refunds. The Tribunal held that the appellant had diligently verified client documents from official government websites, meeting obligations u/s Regulation 10(n) of CBLR, 2018. Relying on precedent (Mauli Worldwide Logistics), the Tribunal found no justification for license revocation as the appellant had no reason to doubt document genuineness. The decision emphasized the reliability of official government websites for verification. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
CESTAT New Delhi overturned the revocation of a Customs Broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposition due to alleged involvement in fraudulent IGST refunds. The Tribunal held that the appellant had diligently verified client documents from official government websites, meeting obligations u/s Regulation 10(n) of CBLR, 2018. Relying on precedent (Mauli Worldwide Logistics), the Tribunal found no justification for license revocation as the appellant had no reason to doubt document genuineness. The decision emphasized the reliability of official government websites for verification. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
