Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Bombay High Court ruled on the priority of secured creditors u/s 26-E of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 over State Tax Authorities' claims. Section 26-E grants priority to secured creditors whose security interest is registered with CERSAI before any other registration. In the case, the Petitioner bank registered its charge prior to State Tax Authorities' attachment order. Previous judgments support the priority of secured creditors in such cases. The Court held that State Tax Authorities must seek satisfaction from sale proceeds, not the asset sold under SARFAESI Act. The petition was allowed.
The Bombay High Court ruled on the priority of secured creditors u/s 26-E of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 over State Tax Authorities' claims. Section 26-E grants priority to secured creditors whose security interest is registered with CERSAI before any other registration. In the case, the Petitioner bank registered its charge prior to State Tax Authorities' attachment order. Previous judgments support the priority of secured creditors in such cases. The Court held that State Tax Authorities must seek satisfaction from sale proceeds, not the asset sold under SARFAESI Act. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
