Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The Bombay High Court ruled on the priority of secured creditors u/s 26-E of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 over State Tax Authorities' claims. Section 26-E grants priority to secured creditors whose security interest is registered with CERSAI before any other registration. In the case, the Petitioner bank registered its charge prior to State Tax Authorities' attachment order. Previous judgments support the priority of secured creditors in such cases. The Court held that State Tax Authorities must seek satisfaction from sale proceeds, not the asset sold under SARFAESI Act. The petition was allowed.
The Bombay High Court ruled on the priority of secured creditors u/s 26-E of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 over State Tax Authorities' claims. Section 26-E grants priority to secured creditors whose security interest is registered with CERSAI before any other registration. In the case, the Petitioner bank registered its charge prior to State Tax Authorities' attachment order. Previous judgments support the priority of secured creditors in such cases. The Court held that State Tax Authorities must seek satisfaction from sale proceeds, not the asset sold under SARFAESI Act. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
