Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Stay of demand - direction as called upon the writ petitioner to make a pre-deposit of 20% - The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the ITAT's order, which denied interim relief to the petitioner. The core issues revolved around the petitioner’s inability to establish a prima facie case, questionable financial stringency claims, and failure to meet the burden of proof under Section 68 regarding the genuineness of certain transactions. The Court found that the ITAT and prior authorities had correctly applied the law, and the petitioner’s financial records did not substantiate their claims. - Appeal of the assessee dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.