Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) - Advance given to Individual for purchase of property - The CIT(A) found that the advance was for purchasing a property intended for business use, as the property had been on lease to the assessee since 2007 and continued to be used as the corporate office. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the Department could not present new evidence to counter the CIT(A)'s findings. The disallowance was deemed incorrect as the advance was eventually recovered, demonstrating its business nature.
Disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) - Advance given to Individual for purchase of property - The CIT(A) found that the advance was for purchasing a property intended for business use, as the property had been on lease to the assessee since 2007 and continued to be used as the corporate office. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the Department could not present new evidence to counter the CIT(A)'s findings. The disallowance was deemed incorrect as the advance was eventually recovered, demonstrating its business nature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
