Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Page of 4921
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98411 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - Referring to the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs. State of Orissa, the Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be levied if the conduct of the assessee is not contumacious. In this case, the Tribunal found no evidence of contumacious behavior on the part of the appellant.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - Referring to the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs. State of Orissa, the Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be levied if the conduct of the assessee is not contumacious. In this case, the Tribunal found no evidence of contumacious behavior on the part of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4921 
