<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Penalty Overturned: Tribunal Finds No Contumacious Conduct in Compliance Case, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77385</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - Referring to the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs. State of Orissa, the Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be levied if the conduct of the assessee is not contumacious. In this case, the Tribunal found no evidence of contumacious behavior on the part of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 15:58:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 18:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Penalty Overturned: Tribunal Finds No Contumacious Conduct in Compliance Case, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77385</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - Referring to the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs. State of Orissa, the Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be levied if the conduct of the assessee is not contumacious. In this case, the Tribunal found no evidence of contumacious behavior on the part of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 15:58:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>