Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Refund the amount deposited by the applicant pursuant to the directions/ order of the DRT, Delhi - The High court observes that IFCI failed to demonstrate that the amount deposited by the applicant was remitted to the Official Liquidator. Despite repeated opportunities, IFCI did not provide a satisfactory breakdown of the amounts deposited with the Official Liquidator, leading to uncertainty regarding the inclusion of the applicant's funds. - Given the failure of IFCI to account for the applicant's funds and provide satisfactory documentation, the court directs IFCI to refund the amount of Rs. 57.50 Lacs to the applicant, along with interest at 18% per annum from the date of deposit.
Refund the amount deposited by the applicant pursuant to the directions/ order of the DRT, Delhi - The High court observes that IFCI failed to demonstrate that the amount deposited by the applicant was remitted to the Official Liquidator. Despite repeated opportunities, IFCI did not provide a satisfactory breakdown of the amounts deposited with the Official Liquidator, leading to uncertainty regarding the inclusion of the applicant's funds. - Given the failure of IFCI to account for the applicant's funds and provide satisfactory documentation, the court directs IFCI to refund the amount of Rs. 57.50 Lacs to the applicant, along with interest at 18% per annum from the date of deposit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
